Friday, November 15, 2013

Modern Essay Criticism of Tess of the D'Urbervilles

Gillian Beer appeared to have one of the shorter essays. It’s not that I was deliberately looking for a short review…okay maybe I was…but only because some of these essays are dense and hard to understand. So I read Beer’s “Descent and Sexual Selection: Women in Narrative.” Regardless of it being short, it was actually really interesting. Also, maybe because it was so short, but Beer doesn’t really talk about Hardy very much. It obviously applies to Tess and she does talk about it but that’s not what she quotes most. She’s not discussing Tess specifically. Instead Gillian is discussing social and evolutionary theories regarding the sexes.

She quotes mostly Darwin and it was totally fascinating! I never really realized that Darwin’s work might extend to people. I always thought he was studying animals and evolution in general but Gillian references works by Darwin which dealt with people and the quotations are awesome. It reminds me of another book I once read called “The Naked Ape” which was a zoologist’s study and observations of people as if they were animals.

Right off the bat, one of the most useful quotes or statements by the writer which I thought could be applied to Tess was this: “Succession and inheritance form the ‘hidden bond’ which knits all nature past and present together, just as succession and inheritance organize society and sustain hegemony” (446). This quote is in the first paragraph so maybe that’s why I liked it so much...I read the first paragraph three or four times before I finally focused enough to keep reading. I thought it was very interesting since we raised the idea several times of what was the point of mentioning the D’Urderville lineage connection to the Durbeyfields? Beer also said “variations in nature are not within the control of will; they are random and unwilled and may happen to advantage or disadvantage an individual and his progeny in any particular environment.” It’s all very interesting because I feel like both statements could’ve been connected and referenced in a discussion about Tess but that’s wasn’t Beer’s priority. Gillian Beer was more concerned with discussing Darwin’s theories on human social evolution in regards to male dominance and social classes.

She quotes Darwin saying “Civilised men are largely attracted by mental charms of women, by their wealth, and especially by their social position; for men rarely marry into a much lower rank.” She also calls Darwin out on claiming “that ‘in civilized nations women have free or almost free choice,’....in contrast to all other species, among humankind the male dominates choice.” I suppose I might just leave these quotes here. I feel like these easily apply to past discussions in class: Hardy’s insistence on his characters having or not having free will, etc. It also gives an interesting claim that men rarely married into a lower rank. We saw in Tess that this was actually an observed issue as Angel worried about marrying Tess.

Gillian’s essay discusses the process of sexual selection and the suffering of the female sex (menstruation) compared to the male sex. In writing about the struggles between the sexes and their rights and ambitions as characters, Beer refers to Hardy and George Eliot (I assume MiddleMarch because it fits the topic).


Overall, Gillian Beer’s essay covers the idea of social expectations of women and how their portrayed in narrative literature. She uses Darwin’s theory of evolution as a great assistant since the d’Urberville’s “’are extinct—as a county family…that is, gone down, gone under.’” The essay is short and full of golden nuggets of ideas. It’s likely that I didn’t even cover everything she discussed but it’s late and most of these essays are dense. This essay, however, is five pages and a quick read if you’re interested in checking  out all the Darwin theories which Beer refers to.

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Tess of the d'Urbervilles - Contemporary Criticisms

It's interesting that we are often led to discuss the reception of Thomas Hardy's Tess of the d'Ubervilles. Nowadays, people who read this book have strong opinions which place them on certain ends of the spectrum. You either hate it or you love it. Maybe you love the book but you hate Tess. It's interesting to me that people should form such strong opinions on a classic character like that. Therefore I expected the contemporary criticisms of this novel to likely be negative. Imagine my surprise that by the first couple of reviews I encountered some of the best examples of praise that we've read so far of the novel's we've blogged about.

There isn't really a better way to discuss the aforementioned praise other than to just pick out the specific quotes.

"Mr. Hardy's new novel is in many respects the finest work which he has yet produced, and its superiority is largely due to a profound moral earnestness which has not always been conspicuous in his writing." -- Clementina Black from The Illustrated London News (January 9, 1892)

"Mr. Hardy has written one of his most powerful novels, perhaps the most powerful which he ever wrote, to illustrate his conviction that not only is there no Providence guiding individual men and women in the right way, but that, in many cases at least, there is something like a malign fate which draws them out of the right way into the wrong way." -- R.H. Hutton from The Spectator (January 23, 1892)

"...all things taken into account, 'Tess of the D'Ubervilles' is well in front of Mr. Hardy's previous work, and is destined...to rank high among the achievements of Victorian novelists." -- From The Athenaeum (January 9, 1892)

That's just a few of them. They all had specific points, but they either ended or began with these noteworthy words and that's what stood out to me. This acceptance and praise of Hardy's novel is not lightly given, in my opinion. It seems several of those who claim it to be a great work, also lament that it is not the typical novel a reader expects. Therefore, it's left to be questioned, is Tess of the D'Urbervilles great and reknowned for it's greatness or it's oddness (strangeness, difference, etc)? The writer from The Pall Mall Gazette (December 31, 1891) is one of those who prominently compared Tess to Hardy's other works. He doesn't dislike Hardy's new novel. He only aims to inform the readers that those who take home Tess "for his delectation over the Christmas fire, thinking perhaps to have another Far from the Madding Crowd, may well feel a little shaken as the gay pastoral comedy of the opening chapters is shifted by degrees into the sombre trapping of the tragic muse." This critic isn't the only one who said something like this. Clementina Black said something similar as she discusses the conventional reader and their expectations which Hardy challenges with a break in the traditional pattern with an unhappy ending. However, there's so much talk about fate ("It was to be"). Should we have expected a happy ending after all the difficulties that Tess endured??